Legal Opinion

People v. Booth

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 12, 2016No. G047986; G052666PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEDSWORTH, J.—

I. INTRODUCTION

This case arises out of a deadly shooting that took place in 1992. Although several suspects were identified in the wake of the shooting, the case was not prosecuted until 2011. By that time, an eyewitness who had exonerated petitioner Darrell Booth could not be found, and the case proceeded to trial in his absence. Even without this favorable defense witness, the jury acquitted Booth of first degree murder. It did, however, find Booth guilty of second degree murder, for which he received an indeterminate life sentence. In this consolidated proceeding,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  2. In re A.R.California Supreme Court · 2021
  3. In re MazurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. In re Von StaichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Cauble CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API