Legal Opinion

People v. Mirenda

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 2009No. D053261PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

We are presented with a case where 26 years passed between the time the criminal charges were filed and the time when the prosecution actually started. The extraordinary delay in this case is made more remarkable because defendant was actually arrested on the criminal complaint in 1982 and agreed to waive extradition. It was the prosecution that declined to return defendant for trial. Defendant was then released and the prosecution changed its arrest warrant to “California only,” apparently to prevent defendant from again being arrested outside this state.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People v. SmitheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. DeSantisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Arriaga v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  2. Dickerson v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. P. v. Jordan CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. P. v. Shammam CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. P. v.Barreno CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API