Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Raffa

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1968No. 40635PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'O’Neill, J.

This appeal presents three questions:

1. Is this ordinance invalid for the reason that the state has pre-empted the city’s right to enact such an ordinance?

2. Is there any conflict between the ordinance and the general laws of the state of Ohio?

3. Is the ordinance invalid on the ground that it is an unreasonable exercise of the municipality’s power to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens?

This court is of the opinion that the state has not preempted the right of a municipality to enact such an ordinance; that there is no conflict between the ordinance and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Neil House Hotel Co. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. City of Akron v. ScaleraOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. East Ohio Gas Co. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. HoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. City of Cincinnati v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. City of Cincinnati v. BaskinOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. City of Dayton v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Fantastic Plastic, Inc. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API