Legal Opinion

Neil House Hotel Co. v. City of Columbus

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1944No. 29967PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Where the General Assembly has spoken through legislation, on a matter of state-wide concern, a municipal ordinance in conflict with such legislation must give way to the superior authority. City of Cincinnati v. Gamble et al., Board of Trustees, 138 Ohio St., 220, 34 N. E. (2d), 226; State, ex rel. Arey, v. Sherrill, City Manager, 142 Ohio St., 574, 53 N. E. (2d), 501, and cases cited therein.

The theory of the cases is that due consideration is to be given to all parts of a constitutional provision. Therefore, since Section 3, Article XYIII of the Constitution grants municipalities authority…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. SesansteinOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Noey v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Zangerle v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State Ex Rel. Zugravu v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Arey v. SherrillOhio Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. GranderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Plymale v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Greater Fremont, Inc. v. City of FremontDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
  5. State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API