Legal Opinion
City of Cincinnati v. Hoffman
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1972No. 71-424PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeebert, J.
These arrests came amid a confrontation between demonstrators and police officers, subsequent to *165the unceremonious hauling down of an American flag by someone in the crowd. As is not unusual, the evidence concerning events immediately preceding the arrests is conflicting and the testimony voluminous. Repetition here of what was maintained at the trial by one side or the other would serve no fair or useful purpose, since the jury found guilt from evidence which is legally sufficient to sustain its verdicts.
Appellants question the constitutional validity of the respective ordinances under which…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Record Revolution No. 6, Inc. v. City of ParmaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- City of Canton v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Cincinnati v. KarlanOhio Supreme Court · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.