Legal Opinion

Jorgenson v. Hillestad

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1947PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The principal question on this appeal is whether the proof sustains the jury’s award of $5,000 as King’s damages for injuries sustained by him as the result of Hillestad’s negligence in operating his automobile on June 28, 1945; and whether that award was warranted by the proof depends on whether there was sufficient competent, credible evidence from which the jury could find that the injuries then sustained by King as the result of Hillestad’s negligence were the cause of a heart attack which King had on August 15, 1945, by reason of a coronary occlusion.

It appears without dispute that as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vogelsburg v. Mason & Hanger Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hinrichs v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boller v. CofrancesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Oresman v. G. D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1971
  3. Grinley v. Town of Eau GalleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Baierl v. HinshawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Withers v. TuckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API