Legal Opinion

Boller v. Cofrances

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1969No. 33PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

On this appeal the plaintiff claims that the trial court should have instructed the jury that:

“The disfavored driver in determining whether the favored driver is approaching the intersection should not be bound to anticipate that the favored driver would be approaching at an unreasonably high rate of speed in excess of the speed limit.”

Whether the trial judge should have given the instruction now urged will not be decided on this appeal, for it was not suggested to the trial judge or otherwise requested at trial. The only instruction requested by the plaintiff which would have affected the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. HutnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Kink v. CombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Price v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. CydzikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. McClelland v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Rogers v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. MesseltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. SchenkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API