Legal Opinion

Prof'l Collection Consultants v. Lujan

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 22, 2018No. A147922; A148925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tucher, J.**

*214*687Professional Collection Consultants (PCC) filed this action to collect credit card debt that Lujan incurred. The parties agree that if Delaware's three-year statute of limitations applies the action is time-barred, but that if California's four-year statute applies the case is timely filed. The trial court applied the Delaware statute, granting summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds to defendant Robert Lujan. On this disposition of PCC's complaint we affirm.

Lujan filed a cross-complaint alleging that the efforts of PCC and others to collect the time-barred debt…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re Bashir Y. Anastas, Debtor. Bashir Y. Anastas v. American Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. McBride v. BoughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Tsemetzin v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Byelick v. Ryvyl Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2024
  2. C.W. Howe Partners Inc. v. MooradianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Jones v. JinparnDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. Korchemny v. PitermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Law Offices of Gary Kurtz v. Markowitz CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API