Legal Opinion

State v. Adamski

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1988No. 54694-1PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Utter, J. —

A juvenile defendant seeks reversal of convictions for first and second degree vehicle prowl on the basis that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a continuance which delayed his trial beyond the speedy trial expiration date mandated by JuCR 7.8. Finding that the State's failure to properly serve a subpoena on its key witness fell below the "due diligence" necessary to justify a continuance, we reverse.

Wayne Adamski was charged by information filed July 18, 1984, with third degree theft. Arraignment was scheduled for August 1. The State filed an amended information on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Roscoe v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. TerrovonaWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Gerard A. Harrison and Harrison Ranch, Inc. v. Carey Prather and William PratherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. DowningWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. DeSantiagoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. DeSantiagoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. JackmanWashington Supreme Court · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API