Legal Opinion

State v. DeSantiago

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2003No. 71918-7PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

—At issue in this case is whether the testimony of three key witnesses from the defendants’ first trial, which ended in a mistrial, could be read to the jury on retrial without violation of the sixth amendment to the United States Constitution or ER 804. The witnesses were unavailable at the time of retrial, the former testimony is sufficiently reliable, and the defendants had similar motive when they cross-examined the witnesses at the first trial. Therefore, we hold that admission of the former testimony was proper.

In addition, the jury found that the defendants were armed with both a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Mancusi v. StubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 2005

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API