Legal Opinion

State v. Jackman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1989No. 55836-1PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

After a jury convicted Wilfred Pope Jack-man of first degree robbery, the trial court ordered a new trial, citing jury misconduct, newly discovered evidence and a misstatement of fact by the prosecutor during closing argument. The Court of Appeals, in an unpublished opinion, reversed the order granting a new trial and reinstated the guilty verdict. State v. Jackman, noted at 53 Wn. App. 1002 (1988). We granted Jackman's petition for review, 112 Wn.2d 1009 (1989), and now affirm the Court of Appeals.

I

On August 29, 1985 at about 2 p.m., a man with a knife robbed the cashier at Roy's Grocery in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. BlazinaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. State v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. Edwards v. Le DucCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Edwards v. Le DucCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API