Lang v. Mayor of Bayonne
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court. Eor opinion of that court, sec 44 Vroom 109.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gummere, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff in error, by this proceeding, seeks to obtain a peremptory mandamus against the defendants in error, compelling them to restore him to his position as a member of the municipal police force.
It appears from the alternative writ, which was allowed by the Supreme Court, and from the return thereto that, by the charter of the city of Bayonne, granted by the legislature in 1869, the board of councilmen of the city were authorized to establish a police force, and to regulate and define the manner of the appointment and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Brown v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
- Burt v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- J. L. Mott Iron Works v. GunnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- City of Albuquerque v. Water Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- Perkins v. EskridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Downs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Perlstein v. WolkIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. PoulinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.