State ex rel. Habe v. City of South Euclid
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant claims that civil service commission rules that provide for appointments in a municipal police department do not supersede similar but conflicting provisions of R.C. 124.44, and that the court of appeals erred in refusing to issue a writ of mandamus based upon the finding that there were no vacancies in the position of sergeant at the time this action was filed. We disagree.
There is a conflict between the eligible list requirements of R.C. 124.44 and the South Euclid civil service rules. The statute provides that the person having the highest rating shall be appointed. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Lightfield v. Village of Indian HillOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Regetz v. Cleveland Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Fern v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- State ex rel. Manor Care, Inc. v. Bur. of Workers' Comp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Tarrier v. Pub. Emps. Retirement Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.