Legal Opinion

Fred M. Anderson and Wayne Nelson, Fred M. Anderson v. Thomas Coughlin, Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 26, 1983No. 85, Docket 81-2429PublishedCited by 284 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:

While the issue before us — did a 12-hour “keeplock” in a maximum security state prison violate plaintiff-inmates’ civil rights — is simply stated, its resolution is more complex and requires detailed analysis. Plaintiffs Fred M. Anderson and Wayne Nelson instituted this action against defendant Thomas Coughlin, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections, for defendant’s alleged violation of plaintiffs’ civil rights in having ordered plaintiff-prisoners confined to their cells in the Great Meadow Correctional Facility on May 21, 1981 for “no reason”…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by284 opinions

  1. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Richard A. LIVINGSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADIRONDACK BEVERAGE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Melvin P. Deutsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Isiah Carl Green v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Judson Warren White v. C.M. White, Warden A v. Dodrill, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

279 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API