Legal Opinion

Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1971No. 148PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

Two issues have been presented:

1. Was the claimant Bernard Hendrix an employee of Starline Trucking Corporation at the time of his injury?

2. Did the injury occur while Hendrix was performing services growing out of and incidental to his employment?

It is the position of Starline and its insurance carrier that Hendrix was not an employee within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act at the time of the injury.

Sec. 102.07, Stats., of the Workmen’s Compensation Act defines employee.

Sec. 102.07 (4), Stats., is a general definition of employee and is as follows:

*519“Every person in the service of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Frint Motor Car Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Village of Butler v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Kimberly-Clark Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Ace Refrigeration & Heating Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Yotvat v. RothCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  2. Page v. GreenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Kress Packing Co. v. KottwitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Doe v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  5. Ide v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API