Legal Opinion

McMillan v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 16, 1989No. 8816SC919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the appraisal provisions of the standard fire insurance policy do not operate to establish a final and binding determination of the amount of loss. Rather, he argues that the appraisal provisions are not binding upon the parties but are revocable at will, and that because any award calculated pursuant to them is not final and binding, there remains a genuine issue of fact as to the amount of loss. He contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendants based upon the appraisal award.

In evaluating this argument we emphasize,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Dailey v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Young v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Ratcliff v. County of BuncombeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. High Country Arts and Craft Guild v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  2. Enzor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. NarronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. First Protective Insurance Company v. RikeDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
  5. High Country Arts v. Hartford Fire InsurCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API