Legal Opinion

Young v. New York Underwriters Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogdeN, J.

Was there sufficient evidence to be submitted to tbe jury upon tbe issues involving tbe competency and interest of Roberts, tbe appraiser, and Harwood, tbe umpire?

Tbe parties entered into a valid and definite written agreement for submission of tbe controversy to appraisers. Tbe appraisers duly took an oath. Himes was selected by tbe plaintiffs and Roberts by tbe defendant. Tbe appraisers so selected chose Harwood as umpire to act only in matters of difference between tbe appraisers. Tbe appraisers and tbe umpire viewed tbe premises and, on 29 July, 1933, they signed and delivered an award in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. Star Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Farmer v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Geiger v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Hemphill v. . GaitherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Yelton v. . McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Firemen's Fund Ins. v. Flint Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  2. Green v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. High Country Arts and Craft Guild v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  4. Carolina-Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. GunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Thomas v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API