Ratcliff v. County of Buncombe
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
The law is well settled that “one who voluntarily proceeds under a statute and claims benefits thereby conferred will not be heard to question its constitutionality in order to avoid its burdens.” In re Appeal of Martin, 286 N.C. 66, 209 S.E. 2d 766 (1974), quoting 16 Am. Jur. 2d, Constitutional Law § 135 (1964). Thus, in Martin, Mecklenburg County was held to be precluded from challenging the constitutionality of exemptions from taxation after having exercised its taxing powers under the statute. Similarly, in Ramsey v. Veterans Commission, 261 N.C. 645, 135 S.E. 2d 659 (1964),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re the Appeal of MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Ramsey Ex Rel. Ramsey v. North Carolina Veterans CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Convent of the Sisters of Saint Joseph of Chestnut Hill v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Goforth Properties, Inc. v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- McMillan v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Ratcliff v. Buncombe County, NCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1987