(PS) Espinoza v. Mroczek
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAMON L. ESPINOZA, No. 2:23-cv-00228-TLN-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RICK MROCZEK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Ramon L. Espinoza’s (“Plaintiff”) Ex Parte 18 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). (ECF No. 5.) For the reasons set forth 19 below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 This action appears to arise from foreclosure proceedings initiated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schrier v. University of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- GoTo.Com, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.