Legal Opinion

Har-Ned Lumber Co. v. Amagineers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 14, 1989No. C6-88-1641Published

1Opinion of the Court

436 N.W.2d 811 (1989)

HAR-NED LUMBER CO., Respondent,

v.

AMAGINEERS, INC., et al., Defendants,

David Gepner, Appellant.

No. C6-88-1641.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 14, 1989.

Mark J. Johnson, Lang, Pauly & Gregerson, Ltd., Minneapolis, for respondent.

James K. Sander, Ann Morelli Spencer, Wagner, Johnston & Falconer, Ltd., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and HUSPENI and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

The trial court determined that service of a mechanics' lien statement by certified mail pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 514.08, subd. 1(2) (Supp.1983)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McIntee v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Goldsworthy v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Har-Ned Lumber Co. v. Amagineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Hoff v. Northwestern Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Enviro-Fab, Inc. v. Blandin Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API