Legal Opinion
In Re Carter
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 20, 1951No. 10504PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.
An Act of Congress declares that “The business of becoming surety for compensation upon bonds in criminal cases in the District of Columbia is impressed with a public interest.” D.C.Code (1940) § 23-602. It requires the District Court and other trial courts “to provide, under reasonable rules and regulations, the qualifications of persons and corporations applying for authority to engage” in this business, and provides that no one shall engage in it “in any such court until he shall by order of the court be authorized to do so. Such courts, in making such rules and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- In Re SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Douglas v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Dennis KaunCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Milligan v. Board of Registration in PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Brooks v. LawsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Taylor v. WaddeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.