Legal Opinion

Port of Seattle v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided July 27, 1938No. 21038PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOWEN, District Judge.

The original bond dated February 21, 1922, was conditioned to save the Port harmless from any and all loss which it might sustain by reason of (1) failure of the employee to faithfully perform the duties required of him by the Commissioners; (2) failure of the employee to account for all funds which might come into his possession belonging to the Port; and (3) a fraudulent or unlawful deed committed by the employee. That original bond *435had attached to it on its effective date a schedule bonding Gormley in the sum of $20,000.

Another condition of that bond was that “this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McKown v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Bromen v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. United States v. RehwaldDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1930
  4. Moody v. Pacific Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Cushman v. RichardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API