United States v. Rehwald
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
The joint accusation against the defendants arises under the Act of March 3, 1927, c. 209, § 1 (7 USCA § 491), which, in so far as material here, provides as follows: “After June 30th, 1927, any person, firm, association, or corporation, receiving any fruits, vegetables, melons, dairy, or poultry products or any perishable farm products of any kind or character * * * in interstate commerce, or in the District of Columbia, for or on behalf of another, who * * * shall knowingly and with intent to defraud fail truly and correctly to account therefor shall be guilty of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. ThindSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Cassarello v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1919
- State ex rel. McKown v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Cushman v. RichardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
3Cited by7 opinions
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Campbell v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Davenport v. SimonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
- Port of Seattle v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1938
- Employment Security Commission of Wyoming v. Great Western Hotel Management, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.