Legal Opinion
Moody v. Pacific Surety Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 27, 1919No. Civ. No. 2762PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the surety on the bond of W. M. Smith, as administrator of the estate of A. E. Moody, deceased.
The conceded facts are that in January, 1905, Smith was appointed administrator of the estate; in February, 1911, he filed his account as such administrator, showing $2,577.66 in his hands belonging to said estate. In January?, 1914, the probate court removed Smith as administrator and appointed respondent in his stead; in February, 1917, a citation was. issued to, and personally served on, Smith, requiring him…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chaquette v. OrtetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- State ex rel. McKown v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Evans v. GerkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Caldwell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Lugiani v. Landau Economic Syphon Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spencer v. PringleWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- Hornaday v. HornadayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Alpha Hardware & Supply Co. v. Ruby Mines Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Port of Seattle v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1938
- Hornaday v. HornadayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949