Bromen v. O'Connell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action by a guardian against a former guardian and two sureties. As to one surety, defendant Bot, there was a dismissal. There was consolidated with this action below an appeal from an order of the probate court allowing the final account of O’Connell as guardian and charging him with the balance for which the judgment appealed from was entered. Defendant Western Surety Company appeals from the judgment against it for $3,835.70, exclusive of costs.
Wre consider the facts as stated in the frank and concise brief for appellant. O’Connell became guardian of the minor’s estate in 1919, furnishing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McMullen v. Winfield Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Board of Education v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Inhabitants of Hudson v. MilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Southern Surety Co. v. TessumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Dugger v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Surety Corporation of New York v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Wilkins v. DealNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Grandy v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Sims v. Duck (In Re FoodSource, Inc.)District Court, N.D. California · 1991
- In Re Slack EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.