Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Loofbourrow

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1954No. 8090PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in this-court for a writ of prohibition to restrain respondent from setting down for trial before the court without a jury the case of Paul Albert Desfosses, doing business under the firm name and style .of Paul’s Plumbing & Heating, Plaintiff, v. R. M.. Farmer, also known as Roland M. Farmer' and Bertha G. Farmer, his wife, Defendr ants, and for writ of mandate to compel said respondent, as District Judge of the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District in and for the County of Bannock, to grant applicant a trial by jury.

This controversy…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Ex Parte SimonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Brown v. BuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. McShane v. QuillinIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Lake O'Woods Club v. WilhelmWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. WrightIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Van Vranken v. Fence-CraftIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Ebersole v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. BennionIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API