Hasty v. Pierpont
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Allen, J.:
This is an original proceeding in mandamus to require the defendant, as judge of the district court of Sedgwick county, to decide plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of a referee, in an action pending in his court, upon its merits and in the exercise of judicial discretion.
The action in which the motion for a reference was filed was brought by Hasty to recover an attorney fee from three named defendants for professional services alleged to have been rendered under agreement with the defendants. One of the defendants demurred to the amended…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Walker v. New Mexico & Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Susquehanna Steamship Co. v. A. O. Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Kimball v. ConnorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
- Atchison Street Railway Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bair v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Kansas Malpractice Victims Coalition v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Waggener v. Seever Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Bourne v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Windholz v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.