Hyde v. Thornton
California Supreme Court
Petition to the Supreme Court to settle exceptions in an action appealed from the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion,
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
This is an original proceeding in this court to settle a “bill of exceptions” taken on behalf of petitioners, who are appellants in the above-entitled cause.
We have examined the petition and answer thereto, and are of opinion that on at least one of the points made on their appeal the petitioners are entitled to take an appeal and be heard thereon; and that under the decision of this court in the case of Herrlich v. McDonald, 80 Cal. 472, the proper mode of bringing the matter up *84on an appeal is by bill of exceptions. They are, therefore, entitled to have a bill settled and allowed.
But this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Landers v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Green v. ThorntonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Hansen v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
- El Pueblo v. FernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1907