Hyde v. Boyle
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco refusing to vacate an order allowing a writ of restitution on a judgment, and an order adjudging certain defendants to be in contempt and awarding an alias writ. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
In effect, this case has already been before this court three times. The first (Hyde v. Thornton, *383 Cal. 83) was a petition asking this court to settle exceptions, on the ground that the judge of the tidal court refused to do so. This court held, after argument, that the defendants had the right to be heard on appeal, but they must compel the trial court to settle the statement if it refused, and could not ask this court to do so.
The second time (Hyde v. Boyle, 86 Cal. 352) was an application for leave to prove an exception, which, under the circumstances, this court declined to do.
Th…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hyde v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Moore v. Judge of Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by7 opinions
- Green v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Green v. ThorntonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Bertz v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Carbon Crest LLC v. Tencue Productions, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.