Marino Property Co. v. PORT COMMISSIONERS OF PORT OF SEATTLE
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Appellant Marino Property Company makes numerous challenges to the Port of Seattle's attempt to convey certain tidal lands to the City. The Port claims most of Marino's claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We hold the doctrine dispenses with most of Marino's claims. As to the questions Marino raises that are not barred, those involving the surplus property statute, RCW 39.33.010, we hold the statute is constitutional and the trial court's finding the property at issue is surplus was not arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law.
Since respondent Port of Seattle raises a res…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Haddenham v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Loveless v. YantisWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Johnston v. Beneficial Management Corp. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Williams v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kreidler v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Ensley v. PitcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Dioxin/Organochlorine Center v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- In re the Marriage of ShoemakerWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Marriage of ShoemakerWashington Supreme Court · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.