Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Shoemaker
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1995No. 62169-1PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
904 P.2d 1150 (1995)
128 Wash.2d 116
In re the MARRIAGE OF John A. SHOEMAKER, Petitioner, and
Pamela Rushing, f/k/a Shoemaker, Respondent.
No. 62169-1.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
November 9, 1995.
John A. Shoemaker, Port Orchard, pro se.
The Public Advocate, Michael W. Louden, Seattle, for petitioner.
The Paja Law Firm, Marilyn Paja, Port Orchard, Cynthia D. Rosa, Bremerton, for respondent.
JOHNSON, Justice.
The trial court in this case vacated a child support order entered 5 years previously which modified the terms of the original dissolution decree. Under the vacated order, each parent had…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lejeune v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Koon v. KoonWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re the Marriage of FlannaganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Weber v. BiddleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re the Marriage of TimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re the Marriage of ScanlonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- In re the Marriage of BaroneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Fields Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Kingery v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- In re the Marriage of UrbanaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.