Legal Opinion

Wareing v. Schreckendgust

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1996No. 95-553PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

This is an appeal from the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County. Following a bench trial, the District Court awarded Plaintiffs, Lee and Donna Wareing, a prescriptive ditch easement across Schreckendgust’s property, costs and attorney fees. Additionally, the District Court ordered the parties to equally share the costs of replacing the ditch culvert crossing Defendant Schreckendgust’s property. Defendant Schreckendgust appeals. We affirm.

We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

1. Must the elements of a prescriptive easement be proved by a preponderance of evidence or by…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In re J.L.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Public Lands Access Ass'n v. Boone & Crockett Club Foundation, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Warnack v. Coneen Family TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Marriage of Barron v. BarronMontana Supreme Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. PartinMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. GlausMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Leichtfuss v. DabneyMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. PassmoreMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Heller v. GremauxMontana Supreme Court · 2002

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API