Legal Opinion

Rudio v. Yellowstone Merchandising Corp.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1982No. 82-067PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

Morris Rudio initiated this action following the default of Yellowstone Merchandising on their contract to buy Rudio’s business. Defendant, Yellowstone Merchandising Corporation, was the original buyer on the sale contract. Defendant, Intermountain Merchandising Corporation, was assigned the contract by Yellowstone. Defendants, Eugene B. Thayer, Penelope Thayer, Robert G. Hicks, and Barbara J. Hicks, signed an agreement guarantying the original obligation. Defendant, Montana Merchandising, Inc., is the parent corporation and secured creditor of Intermountain Merchandising, Inc. The District…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clovis National Bank v. ThomasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Schulz v. PeakeMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. First Westside Nat. Bank of Gr. Falls v. LleraMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re Mid State Wood Products CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
  5. Miller v. TitecaMontana Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Producers Cotton Oil Co. v. Amstar Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Nitzel v. WickmanMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Erler v. Creative Finance & Investments, L.L.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Kephart v. PortmannMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. First Nat. Mont. Bank of Missoula v. McGuinessMontana Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API