Legal Opinion
Alsop v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1978No. 3023PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, Justice.
In August, 1974, appellants brought what purported to be a class action seeking a declaratory judgment. They sought reimbursement from the state for the decrease in access to their property which would result from what was then a proposed redesign of the New Seward Highway in Anchorage. The trial court ruled that none of the appellants would suffer any compensa-ble damage by reason of the redesign. Appellants contend in this appeal that this ruling by the trial court was erroneous.
The appellants are owners of property located in the vicinity of 76th Avenue and the New Seward…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Occidental Land, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- DeLisio v. Alaska Superior CourtAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. Alaska Continental Development Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Triangle, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Bakke v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.