Legal Opinion

Mannesmann-Merr, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 30, 1966No. R.D. 11243; Entry Nos. 592; 821; 944; 1256PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DoNLON, Judge:

Imported parts to be assembled, together with certain non-imported parts, for installation as an automatic extrusion press in the steel mill of Kilby Steel Co., at Anniston, Ala., were entered by plaintiff, in five lots, during the period between September 1958 and February 1959. Plaintiff, formerly known as Mannesmann-Meer Engineering and Construction Co., Inc., of Easton, Pa., at that time had removed its offices to Youngstown, Ohio, and changed its name to Mannesmann-Meer, Inc., the name in which this action is titled.

Sixty per cent of plaintiff’s capital stock is owned by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. United States v. John V. Carr & Son, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1964
  3. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Union Carbide Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Chr. Bjelland & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robert E. Landweer & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. American Greiner Electronic, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  3. Mannesmann-Meer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Picker Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API