Legal Opinion

C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 16, 1965No. Reap. Dec. 11058; Entry No. 2134PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richardson, Judge:

The importation in issue is a machine described on the invoice as a 4-cubic yard spindle mixer model No. 112S-2A which is, in fact, a spindle-type tilt concrete mixer, exported from Canada April 30,1960, by Koehring-Waterous, Ltd., Brantford, Ontario, to its sole United States purchaser, C. S. Johnson Co., Cham-paign, Ill., a division of Koehring-Waterous Corp. of Milwaukee, Wis., which owns the exporter corporation; invoiced and entered at $8,690, Canadian dollars. The machine was appraised on the basis of constructed value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Union Carbide Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. C. J. Tower & Sons of Niagara, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. Mannesmann-Merr, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API