Legal Opinion

Bendon v. Parfit

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1913No. 11043PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kitsap county, McKenney, J., entered August 16, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for equitable relief.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

— The plaintiff filed a bill in equity seeking twofold relief, (a) to obtain a decree directing the cancellation *646of a deed executed by the defendants Parfit to their codefendants, and (b) to require the Parfits to specifically perform a parol contract for the conveyance of certain real property. The plaintiff prevailed in both aspects of the case, and all of the defendants have appealed.

The court found that the Parfits, about the 1st day of September, 1909, being the owners of lots 6 to 12, inclusive, block 10, of Sweeney’s addition to the town of Port Orchard, entered into a parol contract…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ankeny v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Borrow v. BorrowWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Mudgett v. ClayWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Colpe v. LindblomWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Kuhl v. LightleWashington Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Wallace Real Estate Investment Inc. v. GrovesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Richardson v. Taylor Land & Livestock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Peoples National Bank v. Birney's Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Miebach v. ColasurdoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API