Legal Opinion

Mudgett v. Clay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1892No. 509PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Superior Gov/rt, Snohomish County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, C. J.

The respondent instituted this action against the appellants to enforce the specific performance of a parol agreement to convey two lots in the city of Snohomish, described in the complaint. An issue is raised by the pleadings as to what the contract was between the parties. There is a conflict as to the time when the agreement was made, and also as to certain of its terms and conditions, but it is not controverted that a contract was entered into to convey the land. And it is fairly established by the evidence that the respondent, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leaird v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Crabtree v. LevingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. PotelloUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Powers v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Mobley v. HarkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Tucker v. ThravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Gibson v. RouseWashington Supreme Court · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API