Schance v. H. O. Adams Tile Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict in an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by respondent when she fell while walking along a strip of tar paper which appellants had placed upon the floors in her home in order to protect the floors while they were doing work for which they had been hired.
There is no dispute as to the following facts: The appellants Leslie were the employees of H. 0. Adams Tile Company which was a partnership composed of H. 0. Adams and Edward W. Lucio. The Leslies were engaged as such employees in replacing tile in a shower…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Ridge v. Boulder Creek Union Junior-Senior High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- McStay v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harbourn v. Katz Drug CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Hendershott v. MacY'sCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Bevis v. Terrace View Partners, LP, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Schmitt v. Northern Improvement CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- John Furukawa v. Yoshio OgawaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.