Legal Opinion

Hendershott v. MacY's

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1958No. Civ. 17583PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants after jury verdict and attempts to appeal from an order denying new trial. *

Questions Presented

1. Refusal of certain instructions, particularly on res ipsa loquitur.

2. Admission of evidence of experiment.

Evidence

Plaintiff with her husband purchased some dishes on the fifth floor of Macy’s San Francisco store. Four cups, four saucers and four dinner plates were packed in a box and plaintiff proceeded to take the down escalator, carrying the box in her right hand. In her left hand she had a small soft package of “towels and things” and a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Leet v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Kataoka v. May Department Stores Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Di Mare v. CresciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Squaw Valley Ski Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Brown v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Vandagriff v. J. C. Penney Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. McIntyre v. Smoke Tree Ranch StablesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API