Legal Opinion

Ditton v. Bowerman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 30, 1992No. 16-90-05212; CA A69471PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a summary judgment for defendants. The question in this case is whether plaintiffs’ claim against defendants for breach of contract is barred by claim or issue preclusion. We reverse.

Plaintiffs, who are architects, identified property in Eugene that they believed could be rehabilitated into profitable rental space for commercial use. They needed funding for the project and reached an agreement with defendants whereby defendants would fund the project and plaintiffs would provide certain services related to the project. Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint:

“It was agreed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Whitaker v. Bank of NewportOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Taal v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Clapp v. Oregonian Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Pollard v. Pollard's L. L. & L., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bloomfield v. WeaklandOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lee v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. E.B. Harper & Company, Incorporated v. Nortek, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Eagle-Air Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. HapheyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API