Legal Opinion
Lahaza v. Azeff
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 31, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-7896PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BARTLE, District Judge.
This is a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 Plaintiffs M. Matthew Lahaza and Yolanda M. Lahaza (“Plaintiffs”), who are husband and wife, seek to recover damages from defendants Gerald J. Azeff (“Azeff”), Code Inspections, Inc. (“CII”), Mary K. Smithson (“Smithson”), Newtown Township, and Norman McGinnis (“McGinnis”).
Defendants have all filed motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. When considering a motion to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Middendorf v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Christie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Rocks v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Westchester County Independence Party v. AstorinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Emanuele v. Town of GreenvilleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Puricelli v. Borough of MorrisvilleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Boody v. Township of Cherry HillDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Garner v. Township of WrightstownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.