Legal Opinion

Middendorf v. Henry

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 24, 1976No. 74-175PublishedCited by 314 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

In February 1973 plaintiffs 1 — then enlisted members of the United States Marine Corps — brought this class action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California challenging the authority of the military to try them at summary courts-martial without providing them with counsel. Five plaintiffs2 had been charged with “unauthorized absences” 3 in violation of Art. 86, UCMJ, 10 U. S. C. § 886, convicted at summary courts-martial, and sentenced, inter alia, to periods of confinement ranging from 20 to 30 days at hard labor. The other three plaintiffs, two of whom were…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by314 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Schall v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

309 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API