Rocky Ford Canal Co. v. Cox, Judge
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Justice.
On the 15th day of June, 1935, plaintiffs filed in this court a petition for a writ of prohibition. An alternative writ was issued and served upon defendants. Defendants appeared under the order to show cause, filed briefs, and during the November setting of cases the cause was argued and submitted.
Except as a matter of history to show how the cause arose, the facts are of little importance and are not in dispute. Briefly, the defendants in this proceeding filed an application in the district court of the Fifth judicial district of the state of Utah in an action there pending,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Broughton v. StricklinOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Construction Securities Co. v. District Court of Third Judicial District Ex Rel. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fort Vannoy Irrigation District v. Water Resources CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Tudor v. JacaOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Deseret Irrigation Co. v. Cox, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Deseret Irrigation Co. v. Cox, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Deseret Irrigation Co. v. Cox, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.