Legal Opinion

Deseret Irrigation Co. v. Cox, Judge

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1936No. 5824PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

This case is not a companion case, but involves the question just decided in the case of Rocky Ford Canal Company v. Cox, 92 Utah 148, 59 P. (2d) 935. This question arises out of the fact that the Sevier river system is in the process of adjudication as referred to in the former opinion.

On August 22, 1935, one Jorgensen, as trustee for the Wellington Irrigation Company in the Richlands Irrigation Company suit, filed an application with the state engineer, No. A-1300, seeking a permanent change in the point of diversion and place of use from the lower to the upper zone of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rocky Ford Canal Co. v. Cox, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deseret Irr. Co. v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Richfield Irrigation Canal Company v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API