Legal Opinion

Broughton v. Stricklin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1934PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Plaintiffs assert that during a part of 1931 the Pacific Power & Light Company made an arrangement with the Central Oregon Irrigation District and Arnold Ditch Company (corrected by the decree to Arnold Irrigation Company) whereby waters otherwise available at Cline Falls for hydroelectric power development were diverted above Cline Falls and used for irrigation. It appears from the evidence that during 1931, after the execution of the contract above mentioned, Cline Falls Finance Company informed the water master that it would not require 90 second feet for pumping for irrigation or 14.17…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hough v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Simmons v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  3. In re Willow CreekOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. McCall v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Williams v. AltnowOregon Supreme Court · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bennett v. CITY OF SALEMOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. East Bench Irr. Co. v. Deseret Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Rencken v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Oliver v. Skinner and LodgeOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Provo Bench Canal and Irrigation Co. v. LinkeUtah Supreme Court · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API