Legal Opinion

Workman v. Peterson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1950No. Docket 36, Calendar 44,216PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Mrs. Mae H. Peterson in a suit for divorce obtained a decree on the ground of extreme cruelty. No alimony was awarded to her, but the decree provided for a property settlement between her and defendant, Fred A. Peterson. Plaintiff,, claiming that the decreed property settlement was, as to her, grossly inadequate and inequitable, took a timely appeal from that phase of the decree in August, 1948. There was no appeal from the provision of the decree granting the divorce, nor from the provision that the decreed property settlement should “be in lieu of alimony.” Prior to settlement of the record…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seibly v. PersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hagerty v. HagertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Shafer v. ShaferMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Burlage v. Radio Cab CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Angelli v. SherwaySupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  3. Listh v. ListhMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Sheneman v. ShenemanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Sheneman v. ShenemanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API