Legal Opinion

Seibly v. Person

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1895PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to vacate an order reviving a divorce suit for the purpose of awarding permanent alimony. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Elñna A. Adams, in May, 1887, filed a bill of complaint against Edward J. Adams, her husband, in the circuit court for the county of Ingham, praying a divorce from the bonds of matrimony. A subpoena was issued in the usual form, containing an underwriting, signed by the solicitor, which read:

“A personal decree is sought against the defendant for divorce, and the bill is filed to reach interests in property, and not to obtain any further relief against the ■remainder of the defendants.”

The case proceeded, and on the 29th of January, 1889, a decree of divorce absolute was granted, which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Shafer v. ShaferMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Rea v. ReaMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Stone v. BayleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Creyts v. CreytsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Cross v. CrossIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  5. DuMont v. GodbeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API