Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Syre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1986PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*2ORDER

2Per curiam

The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. Inasmuch as a determination of the instant appeal is dependent solely upon an assessment of the record, a decision as to the merits of the appeal is being rendered concurrently.

The appellee, Richard Syre, a lawyer, was found guilty by a jury of witness tampering. He appealed his conviction to the Superior Court, which reversed on the ground that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction (Opinion by Cirillo, J.). 322 Pa.Superior Ct. 416, 469 A.2d 1059. An appeal was taken to this Court, and, finding the evidence to have been…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. SyreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. SyreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. SyreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. HedgecockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. SlocumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Syre v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API