Legal Opinion
Syre v. Pennsylvania
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 27, 1987No. Civ. A. 85-7146PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, an attorney, brought this pro se action against sixteen defendants under a host of state and federal constitutional provisions and statutes as well as common law causes of action. His claims all arise from a state criminal investigation, prosecution and conviction for witness tampering. 1 Presently before me are defendants’ motions to dismiss, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and the Commonwealth’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motions to dismiss will be granted.
Plaintiff was a lawyer for the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jerome Singleton v. City of New York, Ronald Salzer and Anthony DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- De Botton v. Marple TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Barghout v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
- Appeal of SyreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- RUSSO v. COUNTY OF LAWRENCE, PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Salevsky v. Seneca Resources Company, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022